Blofeld directly addresses the spy from the shadows and an attempt is made to apprehend him, but 007 throws his assailant to his death and escapes through a window. The meeting is subsequently disturbed by the presence of James Bond, who has infiltrated the meeting. During the murder, Vogel demonstratively looks away. Hinx becomes Sciarra's successor, killing his opponent Guerra with bare hands. Looking to the impending completion of their Global Surveillance initiative, she encourages aggressive expansion noting that the organization's increased surveillance capability will enable easy counteraction of government intelligence agencies.Īfter Vogel concludes, the subject turns to the replacement of Sciarra. Discussing the organization's recent advances in human trafficking and prostitution, she recounts that since the resignation of the Council on Human Trafficking board, SPECTRE have "placed 160,000 migrated females into the leisure sector." She is briefly interrupted by the entrance of their intimidating leader, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, and maintains a reverent silence until given permission to resume her address. Vogel is one of the SPECTRE board members who secretly met in Rome following the death of their operative Marco Sciarra. It would also reinvent James Bond 26 by including issues of domestic problems in a country, raising the stakes as the fight is closer to home.Dr. evil aspect SPECTRE had and still ensure a shocking revelation for audiences. Bond 26 using a nemesis that resides within Bond’s close circle would remove the good vs. A supposed ally would be able to stay close to Bond and cause him issues throughout multiple movies while remaining undetected. To cut ties with Blofeld’s connection, a nemesis could be trying to bring Bond, or the MI6, down from the inside. One way of doing this is to move away from Bond being targeted specifically.īond’s family was used a lot in Craig’s era, so a new villain would need a different motive. Blofeld is the blueprint for villains across plenty of movies now, so Bond 26 has to include something that has no connection to him. However, Bond 26 does still need that overarching nemesis with a connection to Bond, so it has to create a villain who can be sustained throughout multiple movies. Audiences would be unsurprised by another SPECTRE-style set-up and would know what to look out for. Plus, it means the Bond era can be watched back and fans can connect the stories and spot Easter eggs which revealed the nemesis from the beginning.īlofeld’s story was a clever one by having him orchestrating smaller villains and having a personal vendetta against Bond, his half-brother, but Bond 26 cannot copy this. For audiences, an overarching nemesis allows for a shock reveal and a big face-off between Bond and a criminal mastermind. Creating a story that spans an era raises the stakes for Bond as his fight becomes more personal and adds emotion to the storyline. The new era of Bond needs to balance the smaller villains of each movie with the overarching nemesis that gives Bond a long-term focus.An overarching nemesis is beneficial for audiences and for the plot of James Bond. The James Bond movies are technically individual stories, but the more modern versions have included a long-term story over an actor’s era, and this is still what modern audiences expect. James Bond’s movie future still needs this - albeit in a way that does not include, nor mimic, Blofeld’s storyline. Bond 26 needs to move away from Not Time To Die's story and from Blofeld, but it does not mean that it should not have an overarching nemesis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |